microbial community Search Results


99
Zymo Research zymobiomics microbial community standard
Benchmarking of Multiplex PCR metabarcoding and ONT-16S Barcoding kit. ( A ) Microbe community composition obtained from ONT-16S (left panels) and Multiplex PCR metabarcoding (right panels) sequencing of ML-extracted (ML) and <t>ZymoBIOMICS-extracted</t> (ZP) samples. ( B ) Venn diagrams depicting unique and shared bacterial taxa across extraction methods and sequencing approaches. The diagram shows the percentage of bacterial features detected with >1 read in all three replicates for the two extraction methods: ML (mobile laboratory workflow) and ZP (ZymoBIOMICS kit). Left: Oxford Nanopore 16S kit; Right: library preparation using a multiplex primer set. ( C ) Venn diagrams of bacterial features shared between library preparation methods. Features with ≥1 read in all three replicates are shown for the 16S kit (Oxford Nanopore) and the Multiplex primer set. Left: Mobile laboratory (ML) protocol; Right: ZymoBIOMICS (ZP) protocol
Zymobiomics Microbial Community Standard, supplied by Zymo Research, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/zymobiomics microbial community standard/product/Zymo Research
Average 99 stars, based on 1 article reviews
zymobiomics microbial community standard - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
99/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

96
Zymo Research microbial community dna standard ii
Benchmarking of Multiplex PCR metabarcoding and ONT-16S Barcoding kit. ( A ) Microbe community composition obtained from ONT-16S (left panels) and Multiplex PCR metabarcoding (right panels) sequencing of ML-extracted (ML) and <t>ZymoBIOMICS-extracted</t> (ZP) samples. ( B ) Venn diagrams depicting unique and shared bacterial taxa across extraction methods and sequencing approaches. The diagram shows the percentage of bacterial features detected with >1 read in all three replicates for the two extraction methods: ML (mobile laboratory workflow) and ZP (ZymoBIOMICS kit). Left: Oxford Nanopore 16S kit; Right: library preparation using a multiplex primer set. ( C ) Venn diagrams of bacterial features shared between library preparation methods. Features with ≥1 read in all three replicates are shown for the 16S kit (Oxford Nanopore) and the Multiplex primer set. Left: Mobile laboratory (ML) protocol; Right: ZymoBIOMICS (ZP) protocol
Microbial Community Dna Standard Ii, supplied by Zymo Research, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/microbial community dna standard ii/product/Zymo Research
Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
microbial community dna standard ii - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
96/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

96
Zymo Research zymobiomics microbial community dna standard
Benchmarking of Multiplex PCR metabarcoding and ONT-16S Barcoding kit. ( A ) Microbe community composition obtained from ONT-16S (left panels) and Multiplex PCR metabarcoding (right panels) sequencing of ML-extracted (ML) and <t>ZymoBIOMICS-extracted</t> (ZP) samples. ( B ) Venn diagrams depicting unique and shared bacterial taxa across extraction methods and sequencing approaches. The diagram shows the percentage of bacterial features detected with >1 read in all three replicates for the two extraction methods: ML (mobile laboratory workflow) and ZP (ZymoBIOMICS kit). Left: Oxford Nanopore 16S kit; Right: library preparation using a multiplex primer set. ( C ) Venn diagrams of bacterial features shared between library preparation methods. Features with ≥1 read in all three replicates are shown for the 16S kit (Oxford Nanopore) and the Multiplex primer set. Left: Mobile laboratory (ML) protocol; Right: ZymoBIOMICS (ZP) protocol
Zymobiomics Microbial Community Dna Standard, supplied by Zymo Research, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/zymobiomics microbial community dna standard/product/Zymo Research
Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
zymobiomics microbial community dna standard - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
96/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

95
Zymo Research zymobiomics microbial mock community standard ii
Benchmarking of Multiplex PCR metabarcoding and ONT-16S Barcoding kit. ( A ) Microbe community composition obtained from ONT-16S (left panels) and Multiplex PCR metabarcoding (right panels) sequencing of ML-extracted (ML) and <t>ZymoBIOMICS-extracted</t> (ZP) samples. ( B ) Venn diagrams depicting unique and shared bacterial taxa across extraction methods and sequencing approaches. The diagram shows the percentage of bacterial features detected with >1 read in all three replicates for the two extraction methods: ML (mobile laboratory workflow) and ZP (ZymoBIOMICS kit). Left: Oxford Nanopore 16S kit; Right: library preparation using a multiplex primer set. ( C ) Venn diagrams of bacterial features shared between library preparation methods. Features with ≥1 read in all three replicates are shown for the 16S kit (Oxford Nanopore) and the Multiplex primer set. Left: Mobile laboratory (ML) protocol; Right: ZymoBIOMICS (ZP) protocol
Zymobiomics Microbial Mock Community Standard Ii, supplied by Zymo Research, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/zymobiomics microbial mock community standard ii/product/Zymo Research
Average 95 stars, based on 1 article reviews
zymobiomics microbial mock community standard ii - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
95/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

94
Zymo Research zymobiomicstm microbial community standard ii
Benchmarking of Multiplex PCR metabarcoding and ONT-16S Barcoding kit. ( A ) Microbe community composition obtained from ONT-16S (left panels) and Multiplex PCR metabarcoding (right panels) sequencing of ML-extracted (ML) and <t>ZymoBIOMICS-extracted</t> (ZP) samples. ( B ) Venn diagrams depicting unique and shared bacterial taxa across extraction methods and sequencing approaches. The diagram shows the percentage of bacterial features detected with >1 read in all three replicates for the two extraction methods: ML (mobile laboratory workflow) and ZP (ZymoBIOMICS kit). Left: Oxford Nanopore 16S kit; Right: library preparation using a multiplex primer set. ( C ) Venn diagrams of bacterial features shared between library preparation methods. Features with ≥1 read in all three replicates are shown for the 16S kit (Oxford Nanopore) and the Multiplex primer set. Left: Mobile laboratory (ML) protocol; Right: ZymoBIOMICS (ZP) protocol
Zymobiomicstm Microbial Community Standard Ii, supplied by Zymo Research, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/zymobiomicstm microbial community standard ii/product/Zymo Research
Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
zymobiomicstm microbial community standard ii - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
94/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
FALCO Biosystems Ltd gut microbial communities
Benchmarking of Multiplex PCR metabarcoding and ONT-16S Barcoding kit. ( A ) Microbe community composition obtained from ONT-16S (left panels) and Multiplex PCR metabarcoding (right panels) sequencing of ML-extracted (ML) and <t>ZymoBIOMICS-extracted</t> (ZP) samples. ( B ) Venn diagrams depicting unique and shared bacterial taxa across extraction methods and sequencing approaches. The diagram shows the percentage of bacterial features detected with >1 read in all three replicates for the two extraction methods: ML (mobile laboratory workflow) and ZP (ZymoBIOMICS kit). Left: Oxford Nanopore 16S kit; Right: library preparation using a multiplex primer set. ( C ) Venn diagrams of bacterial features shared between library preparation methods. Features with ≥1 read in all three replicates are shown for the 16S kit (Oxford Nanopore) and the Multiplex primer set. Left: Mobile laboratory (ML) protocol; Right: ZymoBIOMICS (ZP) protocol
Gut Microbial Communities, supplied by FALCO Biosystems Ltd, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/gut microbial communities/product/FALCO Biosystems Ltd
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
gut microbial communities - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
BEI Resources microbial mock community hm-276d
Benchmarking of Multiplex PCR metabarcoding and ONT-16S Barcoding kit. ( A ) Microbe community composition obtained from ONT-16S (left panels) and Multiplex PCR metabarcoding (right panels) sequencing of ML-extracted (ML) and <t>ZymoBIOMICS-extracted</t> (ZP) samples. ( B ) Venn diagrams depicting unique and shared bacterial taxa across extraction methods and sequencing approaches. The diagram shows the percentage of bacterial features detected with >1 read in all three replicates for the two extraction methods: ML (mobile laboratory workflow) and ZP (ZymoBIOMICS kit). Left: Oxford Nanopore 16S kit; Right: library preparation using a multiplex primer set. ( C ) Venn diagrams of bacterial features shared between library preparation methods. Features with ≥1 read in all three replicates are shown for the 16S kit (Oxford Nanopore) and the Multiplex primer set. Left: Mobile laboratory (ML) protocol; Right: ZymoBIOMICS (ZP) protocol
Microbial Mock Community Hm 276d, supplied by BEI Resources, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/microbial mock community hm-276d/product/BEI Resources
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
microbial mock community hm-276d - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
BEI Resources genomic dna from microbial mock community b
Benchmarking of Multiplex PCR metabarcoding and ONT-16S Barcoding kit. ( A ) Microbe community composition obtained from ONT-16S (left panels) and Multiplex PCR metabarcoding (right panels) sequencing of ML-extracted (ML) and <t>ZymoBIOMICS-extracted</t> (ZP) samples. ( B ) Venn diagrams depicting unique and shared bacterial taxa across extraction methods and sequencing approaches. The diagram shows the percentage of bacterial features detected with >1 read in all three replicates for the two extraction methods: ML (mobile laboratory workflow) and ZP (ZymoBIOMICS kit). Left: Oxford Nanopore 16S kit; Right: library preparation using a multiplex primer set. ( C ) Venn diagrams of bacterial features shared between library preparation methods. Features with ≥1 read in all three replicates are shown for the 16S kit (Oxford Nanopore) and the Multiplex primer set. Left: Mobile laboratory (ML) protocol; Right: ZymoBIOMICS (ZP) protocol
Genomic Dna From Microbial Mock Community B, supplied by BEI Resources, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/genomic dna from microbial mock community b/product/BEI Resources
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
genomic dna from microbial mock community b - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Rocha labs biodiversity from arid microbial communities
Benchmarking of Multiplex PCR metabarcoding and ONT-16S Barcoding kit. ( A ) Microbe community composition obtained from ONT-16S (left panels) and Multiplex PCR metabarcoding (right panels) sequencing of ML-extracted (ML) and <t>ZymoBIOMICS-extracted</t> (ZP) samples. ( B ) Venn diagrams depicting unique and shared bacterial taxa across extraction methods and sequencing approaches. The diagram shows the percentage of bacterial features detected with >1 read in all three replicates for the two extraction methods: ML (mobile laboratory workflow) and ZP (ZymoBIOMICS kit). Left: Oxford Nanopore 16S kit; Right: library preparation using a multiplex primer set. ( C ) Venn diagrams of bacterial features shared between library preparation methods. Features with ≥1 read in all three replicates are shown for the 16S kit (Oxford Nanopore) and the Multiplex primer set. Left: Mobile laboratory (ML) protocol; Right: ZymoBIOMICS (ZP) protocol
Biodiversity From Arid Microbial Communities, supplied by Rocha labs, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/biodiversity from arid microbial communities/product/Rocha labs
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
biodiversity from arid microbial communities - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Oxford Nanopore zymobiomics microbial community standards datasets
Benchmarking of Multiplex PCR metabarcoding and ONT-16S Barcoding kit. ( A ) Microbe community composition obtained from ONT-16S (left panels) and Multiplex PCR metabarcoding (right panels) sequencing of ML-extracted (ML) and <t>ZymoBIOMICS-extracted</t> (ZP) samples. ( B ) Venn diagrams depicting unique and shared bacterial taxa across extraction methods and sequencing approaches. The diagram shows the percentage of bacterial features detected with >1 read in all three replicates for the two extraction methods: ML (mobile laboratory workflow) and ZP (ZymoBIOMICS kit). Left: Oxford Nanopore 16S kit; Right: library preparation using a multiplex primer set. ( C ) Venn diagrams of bacterial features shared between library preparation methods. Features with ≥1 read in all three replicates are shown for the 16S kit (Oxford Nanopore) and the Multiplex primer set. Left: Mobile laboratory (ML) protocol; Right: ZymoBIOMICS (ZP) protocol
Zymobiomics Microbial Community Standards Datasets, supplied by Oxford Nanopore, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/zymobiomics microbial community standards datasets/product/Oxford Nanopore
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
zymobiomics microbial community standards datasets - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Immundiagnostik AG butyrate producing microbial community
Benchmarking of Multiplex PCR metabarcoding and ONT-16S Barcoding kit. ( A ) Microbe community composition obtained from ONT-16S (left panels) and Multiplex PCR metabarcoding (right panels) sequencing of ML-extracted (ML) and <t>ZymoBIOMICS-extracted</t> (ZP) samples. ( B ) Venn diagrams depicting unique and shared bacterial taxa across extraction methods and sequencing approaches. The diagram shows the percentage of bacterial features detected with >1 read in all three replicates for the two extraction methods: ML (mobile laboratory workflow) and ZP (ZymoBIOMICS kit). Left: Oxford Nanopore 16S kit; Right: library preparation using a multiplex primer set. ( C ) Venn diagrams of bacterial features shared between library preparation methods. Features with ≥1 read in all three replicates are shown for the 16S kit (Oxford Nanopore) and the Multiplex primer set. Left: Mobile laboratory (ML) protocol; Right: ZymoBIOMICS (ZP) protocol
Butyrate Producing Microbial Community, supplied by Immundiagnostik AG, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/butyrate producing microbial community/product/Immundiagnostik AG
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
butyrate producing microbial community - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
BEI Resources low concentration mock communities
Benchmarking of Multiplex PCR metabarcoding and ONT-16S Barcoding kit. ( A ) Microbe community composition obtained from ONT-16S (left panels) and Multiplex PCR metabarcoding (right panels) sequencing of ML-extracted (ML) and <t>ZymoBIOMICS-extracted</t> (ZP) samples. ( B ) Venn diagrams depicting unique and shared bacterial taxa across extraction methods and sequencing approaches. The diagram shows the percentage of bacterial features detected with >1 read in all three replicates for the two extraction methods: ML (mobile laboratory workflow) and ZP (ZymoBIOMICS kit). Left: Oxford Nanopore 16S kit; Right: library preparation using a multiplex primer set. ( C ) Venn diagrams of bacterial features shared between library preparation methods. Features with ≥1 read in all three replicates are shown for the 16S kit (Oxford Nanopore) and the Multiplex primer set. Left: Mobile laboratory (ML) protocol; Right: ZymoBIOMICS (ZP) protocol
Low Concentration Mock Communities, supplied by BEI Resources, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/low concentration mock communities/product/BEI Resources
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
low concentration mock communities - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results


Benchmarking of Multiplex PCR metabarcoding and ONT-16S Barcoding kit. ( A ) Microbe community composition obtained from ONT-16S (left panels) and Multiplex PCR metabarcoding (right panels) sequencing of ML-extracted (ML) and ZymoBIOMICS-extracted (ZP) samples. ( B ) Venn diagrams depicting unique and shared bacterial taxa across extraction methods and sequencing approaches. The diagram shows the percentage of bacterial features detected with >1 read in all three replicates for the two extraction methods: ML (mobile laboratory workflow) and ZP (ZymoBIOMICS kit). Left: Oxford Nanopore 16S kit; Right: library preparation using a multiplex primer set. ( C ) Venn diagrams of bacterial features shared between library preparation methods. Features with ≥1 read in all three replicates are shown for the 16S kit (Oxford Nanopore) and the Multiplex primer set. Left: Mobile laboratory (ML) protocol; Right: ZymoBIOMICS (ZP) protocol

Journal: medRxiv

Article Title: Development and Validation of a Mobile Laboratory Workflows for Wastewater and Environmental Surveillance with Application in Sub Saharan Africa

doi: 10.64898/2026.04.01.26349919

Figure Lengend Snippet: Benchmarking of Multiplex PCR metabarcoding and ONT-16S Barcoding kit. ( A ) Microbe community composition obtained from ONT-16S (left panels) and Multiplex PCR metabarcoding (right panels) sequencing of ML-extracted (ML) and ZymoBIOMICS-extracted (ZP) samples. ( B ) Venn diagrams depicting unique and shared bacterial taxa across extraction methods and sequencing approaches. The diagram shows the percentage of bacterial features detected with >1 read in all three replicates for the two extraction methods: ML (mobile laboratory workflow) and ZP (ZymoBIOMICS kit). Left: Oxford Nanopore 16S kit; Right: library preparation using a multiplex primer set. ( C ) Venn diagrams of bacterial features shared between library preparation methods. Features with ≥1 read in all three replicates are shown for the 16S kit (Oxford Nanopore) and the Multiplex primer set. Left: Mobile laboratory (ML) protocol; Right: ZymoBIOMICS (ZP) protocol

Article Snippet: DNA was extracted from 24h composite wastewater samples (after prior filtration through 0.22 μm nitrocellulose membranes, WhatmanTM 25 mm) and the ZymoBIOMICS Microbial Community Standard (Zymo Research, USA) using the ML-NA protocol ( ).

Techniques: Multiplex Assay, Sequencing, Extraction